http://kronemyer.com/2009/02/16/songs/576-channel-mixing-system/ Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:08:26 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://kronemyer.com/2009/02/16/songs/576-channel-mixing-system/comment-page-1/#comment-4023 David Kronemyer Fri, 28 May 2010 15:29:54 +0000 http://kronemyer.com/?p=417#comment-4023 Yes we have had several Xtramix over the years (see the Speck user's page). While it is an excellent product we quickly exhausted all of its inputs and it has features (bussing, sends/returns) we don't require. Although perfect for a high-density but low-overall-input-count application, it wasn't quite right for a high-density and high-overall-input count like ours. Thanks for the comment! Yes we have had several Xtramix over the years (see the Speck user’s page). While it is an excellent product we quickly exhausted all of its inputs and it has features (bussing, sends/returns) we don’t require. Although perfect for a high-density but low-overall-input-count application, it wasn’t quite right for a high-density and high-overall-input count like ours. Thanks for the comment!

]]> http://kronemyer.com/2009/02/16/songs/576-channel-mixing-system/comment-page-1/#comment-4004 Stefan Weibel Wed, 12 May 2010 06:03:26 +0000 http://kronemyer.com/?p=417#comment-4004 Have you looked into line mixers like the Speck Xtramix or X-Sum? The Xtramix sounds especially suited to your input hungry studio! I have owned an Xtramix for nearly 20 years and have never come close to using all its 40 input channels but you sure would. Best Have you looked into line mixers like the Speck Xtramix or X-Sum? The Xtramix sounds especially suited to your input hungry studio! I have owned an Xtramix for nearly 20 years and have never come close to using all its 40 input channels but you sure would.
Best

]]>